by Asif Shawkat Kallol (Dhaka Bureau)
Will former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina ever return to Bangladesh? While her recent public statements, interviews with Indian media, and purported audio messages circulating on social media have reignited political tensions and fueled speculation of a comeback, the ground reality remains fraught with complex legal and diplomatic hurdles.
Since her removal from power following the 2024 mass uprising, Hasina has been residing in India. Her future grew increasingly precarious after Bangladesh’s reconstituted International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) sentenced her to death in absentia for crimes against humanity related to the brutal crackdown on the student-led movement. Hasina and her supporters have consistently rejected the verdict, labeling the proceedings as politically motivated.
Central to this debate is a web of legal and diplomatic intricacies. Recently, the Home Minister of Bangladesh, Salahuddin Ahmed, clarified the government’s stance during a press briefing. He stated that the government is committed to bringing the former Prime Minister back to face justice and has already initiated formal requests through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Addressing journalists, the Home Minister said, ‘We intend to bring Sheikh Hasina back under the framework of the law and the existing Extradition Treaty. If she wishes, she can return voluntarily to face the ongoing legal proceedings; there is no legal bar to that. However, the government seeks her return through institutional and diplomatic channels, not through any extra-legal means.’
Analysts point out that the extradition of a high-profile political figure is rarely a matter of rhetoric alone; it hinges on bilateral treaties, international law, and sensitive concerns regarding the individual’s personal safety. The ultimate outcome depends largely on how India responds to these formal extradition requests.
While rumors in diplomatic and political circles suggest a possible return between December 2026 and March 2027, observers view such timelines as speculative. A significant question remains: how would a former head of state, accused of ordering the deaths of nearly 2,000 students and civilians, navigate her return to a country where she faces a capital sentence? Legal experts also note that the window for appealing the ICT’s judgment has reportedly lapsed, further narrowing her legal recourse.
In contrast to Hasina’s defiant tone, her family members have offered a different perspective. In an interview with Al Jazeera, her son, Sajeeb Wazed Joy, remarked that his mother had already been planning to retire from politics. He described her departure from office as, in a sense, the ‘end of the Hasina era.’ This statement, combined with potential legal bans on the Awami League as a political entity, suggests that the prospects of her reclaiming direct political leadership remain dim.
Meanwhile, audio recordings purportedly featuring Hasina’s voice continue to surface on social media- a tactic seen by many as an attempt to keep party grassroots energized. However, digital forensic experts warn that advances in AI-generated voice cloning have made it remarkably easy to fabricate such recordings, complicating efforts to verify their authenticity and often leading to public confusion.
For now, Sheikh Hasina’s future remains suspended between exile, a death sentence from the International Crimes Tribunal, and the shifting tides of regional geopolitics. Despite her stated desire to return ‘very soon,’ the prevailing political climate and the government’s firm legal stance have pushed that possibility into a state of prolonged uncertainty. In this high-stakes geopolitical game, speculation continues to outpace verifiable facts.
##############
The Author:
Asif Showkat Kallol: Works for a German-based online outlet, The Mirror Asia, as Head of News and is a Contributor, Pressenza- Dhaka Bureau.
